Free follow-up review

About to send another follow-up?

Paste the nudge before you hit send — together with the proposal or context the client already saw. ProposalDesk grades the words you pasted and flags whether the follow-up reads as soft, generic, and easy to ignore, so the next message actually restarts the deal instead of fading out.

Review my follow-up See proof examples

Free, anonymous critique. No signup. We only critique the words you paste. Raw text is not shown on share cards.

What it checks
Soft, no-urgency askGeneric, forgettable toneNo new reason to replyMissing clear next stepReply-killing risks
Built on the same Close-Ready Framework as the public critique examples.

Pick the moment

The page does not guess what happened.

These are just common reasons a follow-up gets ignored. The engine only critiques the follow-up and proposal context you paste.

Too soft to act on

“No worries if not” gives them permission to keep ignoring it. Check the ask.

Generic and forgettable

A nudge that could be sent to anyone gets treated like anyone's. See if it earns a reply.

No new reason to reply

Re-pinging without new value rarely restarts a deal. Find out what the message is missing.

Buried next step

If the next step is vague, the reply stalls again. Check whether it points to one clear action.

What you get

A free review before you hit send.

This is not a template library, CRM, or magic follow-up spam. It is a structural critique of the follow-up — read against the proposal context — that may be making the next reply harder.

Free critique

Get a grade, estimated leak, five review-lens scores, and a first-impression preview.

Shareable proof

Save or email yourself the public share card. Raw text is not shown there.

Fix path

If the critique finds issues, generate a Fix Pack and decide whether to keep working in ProposalDesk.

Run the review

Paste the follow-up with the proposal they saw. Get the same result flow as critique.

Include the proposal or context the follow-up is chasing so the engine has enough to grade. The result stays reusable: grade, leak estimate, review-lens breakdown, share card, email capture, buyer objections, and Fix Pack when issues are found.

Paste the follow-upThe nudge you are about to send after silence, exactly as written.
Add the proposal they sawInclude the proposal or last message the follow-up is chasing, so the engine has enough to grade.
Redact private detailsRemove client names, emails, links, exact private numbers, and confidential facts.
Remove names, client details, links, emails, and private numbers before submitting.
0 / 20,000 chars Raw text is not stored - only anonymized grades.

Proof library

Check the critique proof before you paste.

Critique examples

See real critique examples

Browse safe structural examples by proposal type: grade, leak, lens scores, benchmark context, and fix direction.

Open proof library ->Sample critique

Open a real share card

See a public critique result with the grade, estimated leak, review lens scores, and benchmark context. No source proposal text is exposed.

See sample critique ->

More rescue checks

Proposal went quiet

Proposal went quiet?

Diagnose the weak hook, vague scope, or soft close that may be why the thread stalled — before you chase it again.

Diagnose the silence ->Discount pushback

Client asked for a discount?

Check whether the proposal anchored value, proof, and pricing — or left the number exposed to the first pushback.

Check my pricing & value ->